EuroCatalyst 2003: Competition and convergence in European housing finance and fixed-income investment

Preliminary program
DAY 2 Thursday, 23 October 2003
Minimising risk and maximising funding options
(Click here for the preliminary program for Day 1)
(Click here for the preliminary program for Day 3)
MORNING CHAIR / Eric Klopfer, GE Mortgage Insurance
SESSION 1 BOARD ROOM "CAPITAL DARWINISM AND BASEL II"
Speaker to be announced
  Although implementation of Basel II in 2006 is some way off, the implications of Basel could fundamentally and permanently restructure the competitive landscape of lenders in Europe. Some speculate that the advantages gained by lenders able to comply with the favorable risk weighting advantages of the IRB approach will drive massive consolidation of weaker players and potentially eliminate smaller institutions from the market. This session discusses the main issues surrounding the implementation of Basel II, and questions the extent to which national regulators will allow lenders to opt out of Basel II and how it could be applied on a national level. The session asks to what extent domestic political concerns override the desire for uniform treatment of capital globally.

SESSION 2 BOARD ROOM -- RISKY BUSINESS: MANAGING MORTGAGE CREDIT RISK AND BASEL II
  This session highlights strategies to manage mortgage credit risk throughout Europe in a series of sessions focusing on the main areas of risk unique to mortgage lenders:
  • Update on the European Commission position on mortgage credit risk: How does Basel II change product opportunities?
  • What are the latest strategies and tools for managing credit risk?
  • Navigating market and interest rate risk
  • How does Europe measure up to global standards and who sets those standards?
  • What solutions are there for small lenders with disproportionate volumes of default data disadvantaged by the new proposals?
  • Are there any moves on servicing rights in Europe and how will Basel II affect servicing rights?
  •   PANEL    Iain Barbour, Global Head of Structure Finance Research, Commerzbank Securities
    Dieter Gluder, Kfw (to be confirmed)
    other panellists to be announced

    MORNING REFRESHMENT BREAK

    SESSION 3 BOARD ROOM -- INTERNAL PORTFOLIO ADMINISTRATION VS. OUTSOURCING: THE GREAT DEBATE
      Today, European banks outsource approximately 10% of their operations, with research suggesting this isn't enough. Although mortgage lending throughout Europe varies in form but not function, a "factory" approach can - and should be applied to mortgage processing and administration. However, to what extent can an external party create a better factory than lenders themselves using a straight-through-processing approach? Should non-core operations be outsourced to reduce costs and gain efficiencies that are not achievable in-house? While this session won't settle the debate over outsourcing, it will give everyone a greater understanding of both sides of the issue, and ends with an interactive group debate on which activities are considered "core" and "non-core" functions.
      PANEL    Michael Hyman, EDS Credit Services
    Steve Blizzard, Senior Vice President, Countrywide Financial
    Simon Ashby, Policy Advisor, Financial Services Authority
    other panellists to be announced

    SESSION 4 BOARD ROOM -- SHARING LOCAL RISKS IN THE GLOBAL CAPITAL MARKET: PRODUCTS, FUNDING, RISK-SHARING AND CAPITAL MARKETS CONVERGENCE
      As lenders brace against internal and external market competition, one of the most important questions on everyone's minds is "where will new growth come from and what are emerging investment opportunities in European markets?" This session explores how and why European markets are dynamic and growing, how Basel II will affect issuance and investment and most importantly, why Europe is worthy of investor's money.

    LUNCH
    AFTERNOON CHAIR / Will Ross, ABN Amro
    SESSION 5 FUNDING: THE OUTLOOK FOR DEBT INSTRUMENTS (MBS) IN A POST-BASEL II ENVIRONMENT
      European mortgage funding encompasses a wide spectrum of strategies including retail, wholesale, securitisation, covered bonds and whole loan sales. The debate over the superiority of "American" securitisation methodologies vs. "European" covered bond models has traditionally focused on their contradictory, rather than complementary, elements. Clearly, the execution levels of covered bonds in Europe prove their superiority as pure European funding instruments. However, Basel II will dramatically narrow the risk-weighting differential between RMBS and covered bonds, leading us to dedicate these afternoon sessions to evaluate the spectrum of competing funding strategies, including current tools and their outlook given forthcoming regulatory change. They also address the extent to which European lenders will continue their reliance on retail funding, exploration of alternative funding strategies including securitisation and look toward more radical alternatives including institutional deposit-taking.
     
    PART 1   THE INVESTOR'S PERSPECTIVE: CHALLENGES TO INVESTMENT ALLOCATION
    For lenders, what is more efficient to fund - covered bond or mortgage-backed? Are regulatory changes reshaping the structured finance investment space?
  • How will investors sustain or replace assets that mature in their portfolios post-Basel II?
  • Will there be new issuance to replace investments?
  • What is the asset outlook for mortgage-related investments?
  • What are the liquidity issues between MBS and covered bonds?
  • How do maturities factor in?
  • How does the investor base change once risk-weighting has reached 20%?
  •   PANEL    Jeffrey Spencer, Merrill Lynch International
    Robert Paterson, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
    Other panellists to be confirmed
     
    PART 2   THE ISSUER'S PERSPECTIVE: ALTERNATIVE FUNDING STRATEGIES
    Basel II is expected to be finalised by the end of 2003, with a transition period from January 2004 to December 2006. In taking away the flat capital charge, regulatory capital is more keenly aligned to economic capital and theoretically creates a risk management environment in which the two can be brought together. As a funding tool, lenders will continue to securitise to diversify funding and create cash flow for non-bank lenders. While some markets (Italians and Portuguese) continue to free up regulatory capital, taking away capital constraints and incentives to securitise will not make it disappear, but will change the market dramatically.
  • Treatment for mortgages
  • People will look at: What are their options and what is the reallocation of their overall book?
  • From a return on capital perspective, which business should lenders be in?
  • At what point does Basel II require you to look at your overall offering and select businesses in terms of capital efficiency?
  • Will Basel II force a wave of divestitures as people try to rationalize their activities
  •   PANEL    Ganesh Rajendra, director, Global Markets Research, Deutsche Bank AG
    Other panellists to be confirmed

    AFTERNOON REFRESHMENT BREAK

    SESSION 6 REGIONAL MARKET SESSION -- UNITED KINGDOM
    TEAM MANAGER   Michael Coogan, Council of Mortgage Lenders
    TEAM CAPTAIN   Iain Wilcox, Tower Technology
    PANELLISTS   FitchRatings, panellist to be confirmed
    John Sutherland, Nationwide Building Society
    Adrian Coles, Building Society Association
    Clive Wood, HSBC
    Trevor Pothecary, Mortgages PLC
    Bill Cherry, SPML (to be confirmed)

    SESSION 7 REGIONAL MARKET SESSION -- NETHERLANDS
    TEAM MANAGER   Rob van den Berg, GMAC-RFC Nederlands
    TEAM CAPTAIN   Edwin Herrie, KPMG
    PANELLISTS   FitchRatings, panellist to be confirmed
    Nikaj Pannings, Welke Financial
    Bas Millenaar, Hypothekers Associatie


    SESSION 8 BOARD ROOM -- CHAMPAGNE CHALLENGE: NONPERFORMING LOANS, LOSS SEVERITY AND ASSET RECOVERY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE U.S., JAPAN, ITALY AND GERMANY AND THE GROWTH OF SPECIAL SERVICING
      This session provides a comparison and contrast of the evolution, development and increasing need for special servicing as the last barrier of protection from loan default and losses. Comparing economic factors between the United States, Italy, Japan and Germany, the session addresses problems and solutions for high-maintenance asset losses and recovery.

    (Friday, 24 October 2003) © 2003 EuroCatalyst BV